Remote fit wrist braces through artificial intelligence.

INTRODUCTION: Physical boundaries to access skilled orthotist or hand therapy care may be hindered by multiple factors, such as geography, or availability. This study evaluated the accuracy of fitting a prefabricated wrist splint using an app on a smart device. We hypothesize that remote brace fitting by artificial intelligence (AI) can accurately determine the brace size the patient needs without in-person fitting. METHODS: Healthy volunteers were recruited to fit wrist braces. Using 2 standardized calibrated images captured by the smart device, each subject's image was loaded into the machine learning software (AI). Later, hand features were extracted, calibrated, and measured the application, calculated the correct splint size, and compared with the splint chosen by our subjects to improve its own accuracy. As a control (control 1), the subjects independently selected the best brace fit from an array of available splints. Subject selection was recorded and compared with the AI fit splint. As the second method of fitting (control 2), we compared the manufacturer recommended brace size (based on measured wrist circumference and provided sizing chart/insert brochure) with the AI fit splint. RESULTS: A total of 54 volunteers were included. Thirty-two splints predicted by the algorithm matched the exact size chosen by each subject yielding 70% accuracy with a standard deviation of 10% ( p < 0.001). The accuracy increased to 90% with 5% standard deviation if the splints were predicted within the next size category. Fit by manufacturer sizing chart was only 33% in agreement with participant selection. CONCLUSION: Remote brace fitting using AI prediction model may be an acceptable alternative to current standards because it can accurately predict wrist splint size. As more subjects were analyzed, the AI algorithm became more accurate predicting proper brace fit. In addition, AI fit braces are more than twice as accurate as relying on the manufacturer sizing chart.

Erratum to "Hand Surgery Patient Perspectives on Medical Cannabis: A Survey of Over 600 Patients" [Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online 5 (2023) 102-107].

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2022.02.009.].

Functional Outcomes of Cubital Tunnel Release in Patients with Negative Electrodiagnostic Studies.

BACKGROUND: Cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) is the second most common compression neuropathy of the upper extremity. Electrodiagnostic studies (EDSs) are often used to confirm diagnosis. However, negative EDSs can present a difficult clinical challenge. The purpose of this study was to determine the functional outcomes and symptom improvement for patients with a clinical diagnosis of CuTS, but with negative EDSs, who are treated surgically. METHODS: Patients who had EDSs before ulnar nerve surgery were identified by means of database search. Chart review was performed on 867 cases to identify those with negative EDSs. Twenty-five ulnar nerve operations in 23 patients were included in analysis. Chart review was performed to record preoperative and postoperative symptoms, physical examination findings, and outcome measures (ie, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire and the Patient-Rated Ulnar Nerve Evaluation). RESULTS: At a mean follow-up period of 20.7 ± 14.9 months, 15 of 25 cases (60.0%) had complete resolution of all preoperative symptoms. All 10 patients who had residual symptoms endorsed improvement in their preoperative complaints. The median preoperative Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 40.0 [interquartile range (IQR), 23.9 to 58.0], which significantly decreased to a median of 6.8 (IQR, 0 to 22.7) at final follow-up ( P < 0.01). The median postoperative Patient-Rated Ulnar Nerve Evaluation score was 9.5 (IQR, 1.5 to 19.5). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CuTS and normal EDSs treated surgically can be expected to have favorable outcomes with respect to symptoms and improvement in functional outcome scores. After ruling out confounding diagnoses, the authors continue to offer surgical intervention for these patients when nonoperative treatment has failed. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Medical Cannabis in Hand Surgery: A Review of the Current Evidence.

Acute and chronic pain management remains an ongoing challenge for hand surgeons. This has been compounded by the ongoing opioid epidemic in the United States. With the increasing legalization of medical and recreational cannabis throughout the United States and other countries, previous societal stigmas about this substance keep evolving, and recognition of medical cannabis as an opioid-sparing pain management alternative is growing. A review of the current literature demonstrates a strong interest from patients regarding the use of medical cannabis for pain control. Current evidence demonstrates its efficacy and safety for chronic musculoskeletal and neuropathic pain. However, definitive conclusions regarding the efficacy of cannabis for pain control in hand and upper extremity conditions require continued investigation. The purpose of this article is to provide a general review of the mechanism of medical cannabis and a scoping review of the current evidence for its efficacy, safety, and potential applicability in hand and upper extremity conditions.

Hand Surgery Patient Perspectives on Medical Cannabis: A Survey of Over 600 Patients.

Purpose: Medical cannabis (MC) has been proposed as a potential addition to multimodal pain management regimens in orthopedics. This study evaluates hand and upper-extremity patient perspectives of MC as a treatment for common orthopedic and musculoskeletal pain conditions. This study also aims to identify the proportion of patients already using MC, perceived barriers to MC use, and opinions on insurance coverage and legality of cannabis. Methods: An anonymous cross-sectional survey study was conducted of all patients at least 18 years old presenting from October 2020 to January 2021 to a hand and upper-extremity outpatient clinic. The survey collected information regarding opinion on MC, including use, legality, and willingness to use MC in the future. Medical cannabis was legal in the states where the study was conducted. Results: A total of 679 patients completed the survey (response rate 72.5%). Sixty-eight patients (10.0%) reported currently using MC. Of the 623 patients (90.0%) who reported not currently using MC, 504 (80.9%) would consider using MC for chronic pain, while the remaining 119 (19.1%) would not consider the use of MC for chronic pain. Age was not associated with whether a patient would consider using MC (P = .16) or was already using MC (P = .10). The most identified barrier to MC use was cost, reported as either expensive or not affordable by 477 patients (70.5%). Conclusions: This study found that most patients presenting for hand and upper-extremity complaints would consider using MC (80.9%), and most perceive it as a safe treatment option for common orthopedic conditions. Moreover, 10% of patients reported already using MC. One of the major barriers to MC use is the cost. Most (90.9%) patients support policies for legalization and insurance coverage of MC. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III.

Functional Outcomes of Flexor Tendon Repair in the Fingers: A Comparison of Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet Versus Traditional Anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Flexor tendon lacerations in the fingers are challenging injuries that can be repaired using the wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) technique or under traditional anesthesia (TA). The purpose of our study was to compare the functional outcomes and complication rates of patients undergoing flexor tendon repair under WALANT versus TA. METHODS: All patients who underwent a primary flexor tendon repair in zone I and II without tendon graft for closed avulsions or open lacerations between 2015 and 2019 were identified. Electronic medical records were reviewed to record and compare patient demographics, range of motion, functional outcomes, complications, and reoperations. RESULTS: Sixty-five zone I (N = 21) or II (N = 44) flexor tendon repairs were included in the final analysis: 23 WALANT and 42 TA. There were no statistical differences in mean age, length of follow-up, proportion of injured digits, or zone of injury between the groups. The final Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score in the WALANT group was 17.2 (SD: 14.4) versus 23.3 (SD: 18.5) in the TA group. There were no statistical differences between the groups with any final range of motion (ROM) parameters, grip strength, or Visual Analog Scale pain scores at the final follow-up. The WALANT group was found to have a slightly higher reoperation rate (26.1% vs 7.1%; P = .034) than the TA group. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents one of the first clinical studies reporting outcomes of flexor tendon repairs performed under WALANT. Overall, we found no difference in rupture rates, ROM, and functional outcomes following zone I and II flexor tendon repairs when performed under WALANT versus TA.

The Effect of Preoperative Benzodiazepine Usage on Postoperative Opioid Consumption After Hand Surgery: A Multicenter Analysis.

Background Prescription rates of opioids and benzodiazepines have steadily increased in the last decade with the percentage of prescription opioid overdose deaths involving benzodiazepines more than doubling during that time. Orthopaedic surgery is one of the highest-volume opioid prescribing medical specialties, but the effects of benzodiazepine use on orthopaedic surgery patient outcomes are not well understood. The purpose of the study was to utilize the state Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) database to investigate if perioperative benzodiazepine use predisposes patients to prolonged opioid use following hand and upper extremity orthopaedic surgery. Methods This study was retrospective and conducted at three urban academic institutions. All patients who underwent carpal tunnel release, thumb basal joint arthroplasty, and distal radius fracture open reduction internal fixation performed by 14 board-certified, fellowship-trained orthopaedic hand and upper extremity surgeons between April 2018 and August 2019, were collected via a database query. All opioid and benzodiazepine prescriptions were collected from three months preoperatively to six months postoperatively. Results In this study, 634 patients met the inclusion criteria presented to one of the three institutions during the 18-month study period. Patients consisted of 276 carpal tunnel releases, 217 distal radius fracture open reduction internal fixations, and 141 thumb basal joint arthroplasties. Benzodiazepine users were 14.6% more likely to fill an additional opioid prescription (p<0.005) and were 10.8% more likely to experience prolonged three to six-month postoperative opioid use (p<0.005). Conclusion This study found that patients who use benzodiazepines are at a higher risk of filling additional opioid prescriptions and prolonged opioid use following hand and upper extremity surgery. Prescribers should take this into account when prescribing opioids after upper extremity orthopaedic surgery.

Economic and Environmental Impacts of the Wide-Awake, Local Anesthesia, No Tourniquet (WALANT) Technique in Hand Surgery: A Review of the Literature.

The United States spends more on health care than any other country in the world based on the percentage of gross domestic product. This fact is coupled with health care facilities contributing nearly one-tenth of all greenhouse gas emissions in the United States, and with the health care industry's waste contributions to landfills being second only to those of the food industry. In some instances, operating rooms produce the majority of total landfill waste from hospitals; therefore, patients undergoing surgical procedures can have both financial and environmental impacts. Recently, the wide-awake, local anesthesia, no tourniquet technique in hand surgery has grown in popularity. This technique has reportedly allowed surgeons to decrease operating room costs, time, and waste, but without compromising patient safety or outcomes. This comprehensive literature review summarizes the current literature related to the economic and environmental impacts of the wide-awake, local anesthesia, no tourniquet technique in hand surgery.

The Impact of Intraoperative Nursing Care on Perioperative Complications During Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia Hand Surgery.

Purpose: The wide-awake local anesthesia technique in hand surgery is widely used, but there are currently no guidelines or protocols for the number of operating room personnel required to optimize patient safety intraoperatively. This study aimed to evaluate perioperative complication rates of wide-awake local anesthesia hand surgeries performed at surgery centers that used different numbers of operating room nurses. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent wide-awake local anesthesia hand surgery at 4 surgical centers over a 30-month consecutive period. Two surgical centers used 3 operating room nurses, and 2 centers used 2 operating room nurses. The complications reported included intraoperative case abortion because of critical change in patient vitals, intraoperative medication delivery, intraoperative intravenous placement for medication delivery, intraoperative conversion to sedation, intraoperative medical complications, and postoperative transfer to the emergency department or a hospital. Results: A total of 1,771 wide-awake local anesthesia surgical procedures were identified, with 925 performed at a facility that used 2 operating room nurses and 846 performed at a facility that used 3 operating room nurses. There were no perioperative complications in either group during the study period. Conclusions: There was no difference in perioperative complications between the surgery centers that used 3 versus 2 intraoperative nurses during wide-awake local anesthesia hand surgery. This study supports that limiting the nursing personnel for wide-awake local anesthesia hand surgeries could be an efficient way to cut procedural costs without compromising patient safety. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IV.

A Prospective Evaluation of the Prevalence of Persistent Median Artery in Patients with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Background: The median artery is an embryonic structure that typically regresses during gestation. Occasionally, the artery remains and is then termed a persistent median artery (PMA). A PMA can be associated with other anatomic anomalies, and has been known to contribute to carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Recent literature has observed an increase in PMA prevalence, speculated to indicate microevolutionary change. We performed a prospective observational study to investigate the current prevalence rate of PMA in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release (CTR). Methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained. From October 2020 to January 2021, patients ≥18 years old undergoing open CTR by 9 orthopaedic hand surgeons were included in analysis. Patients undergoing endoscopic CTR were excluded. Intraoperatively, the carpal tunnel was evaluated for the presence of a PMA, median nerve anomalies, or any other anatomic anomalies. If a patient underwent bilateral CTR during the study, only one side was included in analysis as determined randomly. Results: Three hundred and sixty open CTRs in 327 patients were performed during the study. Twenty-seven PMAs were identified, for an overall prevalence rate of 8.3%. The average age of patients with a PMA was 63.6 years (SD 13.3 years), consisting of 15 men and 12 women. There were no statistical differences in age, gender, or laterality between patients that did and did not have a PMA. Thirty-three patients underwent bilateral CTR during the study, with 3 being found to have a PMA unilaterally, and zero having a PMA bilaterally. Two bifid median nerves (0.6%) were also identified. Conclusion: This study represents the highest prevalence rate of PMA directly observed in CTR patients reported to date (8.3%). A PMA is not a rare finding, and it should be recognized and protected during CTR. Occasionally, a PMA can be the cause of an acute presentation of CTS.

Perspectives of Orthopedic Patients on Medical Cannabis: A Survey of More Than 2500 Patients.

Nationwide perspectives on cannabis have changed dramatically over recent decades. Although cannabis remains illegal at the federal level, medical cannabis (MC) is now legal in most states, and research has continued to show its effectiveness in a variety of medical conditions. However, both perception and acceptance of MC by the general public are evolving and remain poorly understood. Treating patients effectively with these novel therapeutics requires an understanding of the complex interplay of social and legal factors that could affect patient use. This cross-sectional survey study of more than 2500 patients sought to assess current patient perspectives on MC and to investigate factors related to its use that may represent barriers to broader patient use. Most respondents would consider using MC for chronic pain or other medical conditions. Most respondents were aware of the legal status of MC in their state, and 9 of 10 respondents believed that MC should be legal throughout the United States. General public knowledge of the utility of MC is an area needing improvement because older patients were significantly less likely to believe that MC is safe to use or that MC is safer than prescription opioids. As has been reported in previous literature, social stigma and cost appear to remain barriers for patient use of MC. Our findings provide further insight into current patient perspectives on MC, aiding both medical providers and researchers as we continue to provide access to and research MC. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(6):e309-e314.].

Multiple Opioid Prescribers During the Perioperative Period Increases Opioid Consumption Following Upper Extremity Surgery: A Multicenter Analysis.

Background Opioid prescribing practices have been an area of interest for orthopedic surgeons in the wake of the opioid epidemic. Previous studies have investigated the effects of a multitude of patient-specific risk factors on prolonged opioid use postoperatively. However, to date, there is a lack of studies examining the effects of multiple prescribers during the perioperative period and their potential contribution to prolonged opioid use postoperatively. This study aimed to investigate if multiple unique opioid prescribers perioperatively predispose patients to prolonged opioid use following upper extremity surgery. Second, we compared opioid prescribing patterns among different medical specialties. Methodology This retrospective study was conducted at three academic institutions. Between April 30, 2018, and August 30, 2019, 634 consecutive patients who underwent one of three upper extremity procedures  were included in the analysis: carpal tunnel release (CTR), basal joint arthroplasty (BJA), or distal radius fracture open reduction and  internal fixation (DRF ORIF). Prescription information was collected using the state Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) online database  from a period of three months preoperatively to six months postoperatively. A Google search was performed to group prescriptions by medical specialty.  Dependent outcomes included whether patients filled an additional opioid prescription postoperatively and prolonged opioid use (defined as opioid use three to six months postoperatively). Results In total, 634 patients were identified, including 276 CTRs, 217 DRF ORIFs, and 141 BJAs. This consisted of 196 males (30.9%) and 438 females (69.1%) with an average age of 59.4 years (SD: 14.7 years). By six months postoperatively, 191 (30.1%) patients filled an additional opioid prescription, and 89 (14.0%) experienced prolonged opioid use. In total, 235 (37.1%) patients had more than one unique opioid prescriber during the study period (average 2.5 prescribers). Patients with more than one unique opioid prescriber were significantly more likely to have received overlapping opioid prescriptions (15.7% vs. 0.8%, p<.001), to have filled an additional opioid prescription postoperatively (63.8% vs 10.3%, p<.001), and to have experienced prolonged opioid use postoperatively (35.3% vs 1.5%, p<.001) compared to patients with only one opioid prescriber. Patients with multiple unique prescribers filled more opioid prescriptions compared to those with a single prescriber (2.8 refills vs 1.8 refills, p=.035). Within six months postoperatively, 71.4% of opioid refills were written by non-orthopedic providers. Opioid refills written by non-orthopedic prescribers were written for a significantly greater number of pills (68.4 vs. 27.9, p<.001), for a longer duration (22.2 vs. 6.2 days, p<.001), and for larger total morphine milligram equivalents per prescription (831.4 vs. 169.8, p<.001) compared to those written by orthopedic prescribers. Conclusions Patients with multiple unique opioid prescribers during the perioperative period are at a higher risk for prolonged opioid use postoperatively. Non-orthopedic providers were the highest prescribers of opioids postoperatively, and they prescribed significantly larger and longer prescriptions. Our findings highlight the value of utilizing PDMP databases to help curtail opioid overprescription and potential adverse opioid-related outcomes following upper extremity surgery.

Preoperative Opioid Use Results in Greater Postoperative Opioid Consumption After Thumb Basal Joint Arthroplasty.

Purpose: Thumb basal joint arthroplasty surgery is a common hand surgery after which patients often require opioids. To better understand safe opioid consumption patterns, this study sought to identify risk factors for filling a second prescription and/or prolonged opioid use (prescription over 6 months after the surgery). Preoperative opioid use was hypothesized to show an association with greater postoperative opioid use. Methods: A retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent primary thumb basal joint arthroplasty was conducted, yielding 110 patients for analysis. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Opioid prescription data were extracted from 6 months before the surgery to 9 months after the surgery using a state prescription drug monitoring program. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed for filling a second opioid prescription or filling an opioid prescription over 6 months after the surgery. Results: All the patients filled their initial postoperative prescription. Of the 110 patients, 26.4% filled an opioid prescription before the surgery, 42% filled a second postoperative prescription, and 14.5% were still consuming opioids over 6 months after the surgery. Patients using preoperative opioids had 7-fold higher odds of filling a second opioid prescription and 37-fold higher odds of prolonged use. No other demographic or clinical factors, including the type of procedure or number of initial opioids prescribed, were associated with increased use of postoperative opioids. Of all the opioid prescriptions filled after the initial postoperative prescription, only 9.3% were prescribed by a surgeon's office. Conclusions: Patients who undergo thumb basal joint arthroplasty with preoperative opioid use have much greater odds of filling a second opioid prescription and prolonged use after the surgery. Low initial surgeon-provided opioid dosages did not correlate to filling a second prescription, indicating that lower initial doses are feasible. Finally, nearly all opioid-naïve patients who filled a second opioid prescription received them from providers other than a surgeon, indicating the need for greater communication with nonsurgical providers simultaneously caring for patients in the perioperative period. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic III.

Comprehensive Analysis of Opioid Use After Common Elective Outpatient Orthopaedic Surgeries.

BACKGROUND: Prescription opioid abuse remains an ongoing public health crisis, especially in orthopaedic surgery. The purpose of the present study is to analyze opioid-prescribing patterns and investigate risk factors for prolonged opioid use after common outpatient orthopaedic surgical procedures. METHODS: After institutional review board approval, a review of 1,384 patients undergoing common elective outpatient orthopaedic procedures from January 2018 to June 2019 was conducted. Data on controlled substance prescriptions were obtained from the prescription drug monitoring program website. Statistical analysis was done to identify predictors for a second opioid prescription and prolonged opioid use (>6 months). RESULTS: Over 10% (150/1,384) of patients were still using opioids beyond 6 months. Of the opioid exposed patients, 60.4% (174/288) filled at least 1 additional opioid prescription postoperatively, and 29.2% (84/288) filled prescriptions beyond 6 months, compared with 26.4% (289/1,096) and 6.0% (66/1,096) of opioid-naive patients, respectively. Following multivariate analysis, significant predictors for filling a second opioid prescription included preoperative opioid use, current smoker status, benzodiazepine use, psychiatric disorder, and advanced age. CONCLUSION: This study revealed risk factors for prolonged opioid use after orthopaedic surgery. Surgeons should be mindful of these risk factors and counsel patients regarding postoperative pain management.

Severe acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis is associated with acromial stress fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the role of disorders of the acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) and how they relate to complications after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). The purpose of this study is to compare the severity of ACJ osteoarthritis in patients undergoing RSA with and without postoperative acromial and scapular spine fractures. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed to identify all patients who underwent primary RSA between 1/1/2007 and 10/31/2019 with a postoperative acromial or scapular spine stress fracture from a single institution. Patients who underwent RSA with a fracture were compared with an age-, sex-, and preoperative diagnosis-matched control group (1:4 controls) with a minimum 2-year follow-up. We compared demographics, medical comorbidities, and ACJ osteoarthritis between the 2 groups. Preoperative radiographs and 3-dimensional computed tomography scans were evaluated for ACJ osteoarthritis in all patients. The Petersson classification, a modified Petersson classification, location of the osteophytes, subchondral cysts, ACJ space, and size of the largest osteophyte were recorded and compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: The study included 11 patients who underwent primary RSA (8 women and 3 men) with acromial (6) and scapular spine (5) fractures confirmed radiographically and 44 matched controls (average follow-up 3.1 vs. 4.3 years, P = .17). Average age at surgery was similar between study and control groups (69.6 vs. 70.0 years, P = .86). ACJ osteoarthritis with osteophytes larger than 2 mm was common and similar between the 2 groups (91% of patients with acromial fracture and 66% of controls, P = .15). There was no significant difference in the size or location of the ACJ osteophytes. The Petersson classification was similar between groups. However, the percentage of patients with subchondral ACJ cysts was higher in the fracture group (91% vs. 50%, P = .02), and the percentage of patients with large spanning or fused osteophytes was significantly higher in the fracture group (55% vs. 14%, P = .008). CONCLUSION: Radiographic ACJ osteoarthritis is common in patients undergoing RSA. Severe ACJ osteoarthritis with completely spanning or fused osteophytes may predispose patients to acromial or scapular spine fractures after RSA.

Larger Perioperative Opioid Prescriptions Lead to Prolonged Opioid Use After Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery: A Multicenter Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The opioid epidemic remains an ongoing public health crisis. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether surgeons' prescribing patterns of the initial postoperative opioid prescription predispose patients to prolonged opioid use after upper extremity surgery. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study was done at three academic institutions. Patients who underwent carpal tunnel release, basal joint arthroplasty, and distal radius fracture open reduction and internal fixation over a 1.5-year period were included. Opioid prescription data were obtained from the Pennsylvania Prescription Drug Monitoring Program website. RESULTS: Postoperatively, 30.1% of the patients (191/634) filled ≥1 additional opioid prescription, and 14.0% (89/634) experienced prolonged opioid use 3 to 6 months postoperatively. Patients who filled an additional prescription postoperatively were initially prescribed significantly more pills (P = 0.001), a significantly longer duration prescription (P = 0.009), and a significantly larger prescription in total milligram morphine equivalents (P = 0.002) than patients who did not fill additional prescriptions. Patients who had prolonged opioid use were prescribed a significantly longer duration prescription (P = 0.026) than those without prolonged use. CONCLUSION: Larger and longer duration of initial opioid prescriptions predisposed patients to continued postoperative opioid use. These findings emphasize the importance of safe and evidence-based prescribing practices to prevent the detrimental effects of opioid use after orthopaedic surgery.

Unplanned Office Visits Following Outpatient Hand Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Returning to the office for an unplanned visit postoperatively can be burdensome to both the patient and provider. The purpose of this study was to quantify the rate of unplanned office visits after common soft tissue hand surgeries and assess the reasons for these unplanned visits. METHODS: Patients who underwent common soft tissue hand surgeries over a 6-month time period were queried from an electronic medical record database. Manual chart review was performed to record patient demographics, unplanned visits within 3 months postoperatively, and specific reasons for unplanned visits. A total of 1648 postoperative follow-up visits in 1224 patients were included in analysis. RESULTS: Within 3 months of surgery, 6.3% (103/1648) of postoperative visits were found to be unplanned. There was no difference in the rate of unplanned visits among the included surgeries (P = .46). The most common reasons for an unplanned office visit overall were wound problems (34%), pain (23.3%), and stiffness (17.5%). The trigger finger release group had significantly more patients return to the office for stiffness (P = .01), the De Quervain release group had significantly more patients return for pain (P = .02), and the carpal tunnel release group had significantly more patients return for persistent symptoms (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Unplanned office visits represented about 1 of 16 postoperative visits. Orthopedic surgeons should be aware of the most common reasons for these visits and be prepared to address these problems promptly. Preoperative patient education on these potential problems may help decrease the frequency of unplanned follow-up visits.

The Incidence of Psychologic Stress following a Fall and Surgical Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures.

Background and Purpose Experiencing a fall and a subsequent distal radius fracture can have a major impact not only on patients' physical function, but also on their emotional state. The purpose of this project was to describe the prevalence of fear of falling (FoF) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) following surgically managed distal radius fractures due to a fall. Methods Patients who underwent surgery for a distal radius fracture due to a fall were identified by a database query. Patients were divided into three groups based on time from surgery: 0 to 2 weeks (acute), 3 to 6 months (mid-term), and 12 to 15 months (long-term). FoF was measured using the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) questionnaire. PTSD was measured using the PTSD Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) Text Revision-5 (PCL-5) questionnaire. A total of 239 patients who met inclusion criteria were consented via phone and completed the emailed surveys. Results FES-I scores were significantly higher in the acute group versus the long-term group ( p = 0.04). High concern for FoF was observed in 63% (19/30) of patients in the acute group, in 35% (14/40) in the mid-term group ( p = 0.019 vs. acute), and in 19% (8/42) in the long-term group ( p < 0.001 vs. acute). Probable PTSD was observed in 2.3% (1/44) of patients in the acute group, in 4.8% (2/42) in the mid-term group, and in 7.3% (3/41) in the long-term group. Conclusion Patients who undergo surgical fixation of a distal radius fracture due to a fall are subject to FoF and PTSD symptoms. To maximize postoperative outcomes, it is important for surgeons to be aware of these psychological effects and know how to screen for them. Level of Evidence This is a Level III study.

Nonsurgical Providers Provide the Majority of Postoperative Opioid Prescriptions After Hand Surgery.

Introduction The increased use of Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) websites has helped physicians to limit overlapping controlled substance prescriptions and help prevent opioid abuse. Many studies have investigated risk factors for prolonged opioid use after orthopedic surgery, but few studies have investigated who is prescribing opioids to postoperative patients. The purpose of this study is to investigate the types of medical providers prescribing opioids to hand surgery patients postoperatively. Methods Institutional Review Board approval was obtained prior to initiation of this study. An institutional database search was performed to identify all patients ≥18 years old that underwent a single hand surgery at our institution during a specified time period. Patients with more than one surgical procedure during this time were excluded to prevent potential crossover with opioid prescriptions for different surgical procedures. A search of the state PDMP website was performed to identify opioid prescriptions filled by hand surgery patients from six months preoperatively to 12 months postoperatively. Opioid prescribers were classified into several groups: 1) the patient's operating surgeon, 2) other orthopedic surgery providers, 3) general medicine providers (internal medicine, primary care, family medicine, and adult health providers), and 4) all other medical providers. Results Three hundred twenty-seven patients could be identified in the PDMP database who received an opioid prescription on the day of surgery. Of these, 108 (33.0%) filled a total of 341 additional opioid prescriptions postoperatively. Non-orthopedic providers prescribed 81.5% of all opioid prescriptions within 12 months postoperatively, with the patient's operating surgeon prescribing only 10% of all prescriptions. General medicine providers were the highest prescriber group at 28.7% of total postoperative opioid prescriptions. From six to 12 months postoperatively, the patient's operating surgeon prescribed only 4.9% of total opioid prescriptions filled. The patient's operating surgeon prescribed significantly smaller average opioid prescriptions in total morphine milligram equivalents compared to all other provider groups. Conclusions Surgeons should be aware that their surgical patients may be receiving opioid prescriptions from a wide variety of medical providers postoperatively, and that these other providers may be prescribing larger prescriptions. The findings of this study emphasize the importance of collaboration across medical specialties to mitigate the risks of prolonged opioid use after hand surgery.

Workers' Compensation Status Confers a Greater Number of Postoperative Visits After Common Upper Extremity Surgeries.

Background The impact of Workers' Compensation (WC) status on postoperative healthcare utilization in hand and wrist surgery clinical practice is presently unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare the number of postoperative visits in WC to non-WC patients after common upper extremity surgical procedures. Methodology All patients who underwent one of four common surgical procedures (carpal tunnel release, De Quervain's release, cubital tunnel release, and trigger finger release) between 2016 and 2019 were identified. A total of 64 surgeries billed under WC were randomly selected and matched 1:1 to surgeries billed outside of WC based on the primary CPT code. Results The most common procedure was carpal tunnel release (42 patients), followed by trigger finger release (30 patients), cubital tunnel release (28 patients), and De Quervain's release (16 patients). The average number of postoperative visits was 2.3 (median = 2, range: 1-9) and was significantly higher in the WC group (mean/median = 3.0/3 versus 1.5/1, p < 0.001). Within the 90-day global postoperative billing period, the mean number of visits was 2.2 (median = 2, range: 1-4) in the WC group and 1.4 (median = 1, range: 1-3) in the non-WC group (p < 0.001). The average time to clinical discharge in the WC group was 101 days (range: 10-446 days), and in the non-WC group was 40 days (range: 7-474 days) (p < 0.001). Five patients (7.8%) in the WC group and four patients (6.3%) in the non-WC group were seen for unplanned visits after clinical discharge. Conclusions WC status conferred more postoperative visits after common upper extremity surgical procedures, both within and beyond the global billing period. Further investigation and targeted strategies are required to address the observed increase in healthcare utilization.